What a journey this has been! My introduction to official research via the Undergrad Research Grant has really influenced my journey toward grad school and beyond. Through the hard work, triumphs and challenges of this process, I am glad to say that I have really fallen in love with research and I am currently looking for research fellowships for grad school. Being critically reflexive through this process has also steered me toward new interests and questions about related topics, such as seed saving. My current research project centers urban agriculture, gentrification and Crit Race theory. Through my research, seed saving has emerged as an extremely inspiring means of resistance and survival for small farmers in the city, belonging to networks of seed saving channels and communities. I have previously examined the cultural weight of this practice for a capstone essay last semester, and I would like to revisit it with deeper field research. This is the basis behind my ambition to re-apply for another grant for the summer with my mentor, Dr. Denise Santiago.
Our current research project has blossomed in the kitchens of small farmers, on plots of land ravaged by winter, and via email with food justice advocates that trot the globe with intentions for food revolution. This has been an extremely rewarding journey and one that I would love to continue. To see theory in practice is a mind-opening experience, connecting academia to the world in which it spectates. The community health profiles I am building are almost at completion, and I am currently gathering more historic background of how and why community farms/gardens emerged in these areas to begin with. The histories, as I am seeing it so far, mirror present-day conditions of food insecurity, land sovereignty and health disparities throughout the boroughs I am looking at. The only challenges with this project, I would say, is studying urban farms in the off-season of harvest limits the amount of community members I meet in their natural elements. This, in turn, limits the amount of voices I get to incorporate. However, I have learned so much from this project, and I plan to infuse my recent learnings into summer research on seed saving and community.
Data collection for my research project is heavily centered around harvesting season. The project examines three urban farms in different boroughs of New York. I have made a substantial amount of progress with researching context for each farm. This would include population, demographics, health profiles, and more. I have conducted three very useful interviews that I have transcribed. I am making connections to my theory with the interviews, and exploring now more than my original chosen tenet of critical race theory to examine. I could, however, improve on continuing to set up interviews, as the season is over for growing and harvesting, and most farm coordinators have their sights set on grant writing and spring planning.
From the data collected so far, I feel that I am experiencing theory in practice, making this experience as raw as ever. I am pulling more nuanced questions from my interviews, like “Does having white managers reaffirm or denounce the basic claim of critical race theory, that racism permeates every aspect of life? There is no yes or no answer for this complex question, but from what I am witnessing on these farms, it is highly situational. Looking at managerial positions through a critical lens has been very interesting, but at the opening of harvesting season of early spring, I have community members on my radar for interviewing. I feel that I need to incorporate many more stories, voices, and opinions in my research. I want my examinations to be well-rounded, displaying polyvocality in my narrative. This experience thus far has my ambitions high, and my sights set on presenting my research at a conference next year.
Our working title for this project is The Geographies of Food Justice: Urban Farming & Empowerment Through the Lens of Critical Race Theory, which will be a study of three urban farms situated in increasingly gentrifying areas. Through standard methods of data gathering and interviewing, we are compiling information and testimonies to draw conclusions about the ways in which race functions as a means of exclusion from implementation of, and participation in, the farms. This research will be significant in bringing nuance to the ways in which we view food justice and community gardening. We plan to discuss the shortcomings of “external social justice change agents” as well as the concessions communities of color have made in order to maintain funding from predominantly white institutions. My goal is to present our research at the annual Notre Dame Peace Conference in the form of a Ted-talk. We also want to develop a 5-minute film on the geographies of food access and desertification, and develop an accessible paper for publication.
I plan to achieve making concepts of critical race theory easier to understand for everybody, through examples and application of the theory to the practice of our everyday lives, as this is my over-arching rationale behind using this theory. We will be using primarily qualitative methods to examine people and the phenomena of their work. Our research looks to theorize around these experiences, giving voice to communities largely forgotten in the mainstream narrative of food justice. Although our evaluations will take quantitative data into serious considerations (health profiles of the communities, household income, etc), at the forefront of our research, we are looking to honor participants’ voices and stories using interviews. I am spending a set number of hours each week to create community profiles for each farm around health, income, demographic and scarcity of affordable markets selling fresh produce. I am also aiming to conduct at least one interview a week. I anticipate seeing first-hand how interdisciplinary the food justice movement is and should be, as well as exploring the ways to make implementation an inclusive process.